Most
of Susan Te Kahurangi King’s work had a cartoony, childhood doodle feel
to them. I realized, after reading more about her, that she was influenced by
the cartoons she grew up watching. I found the layout of her works that have a
lot going on to be interesting. I’m used to seeing art where a single character
is the main focus of a drawing but most of her work seemed to portray a scene.
Many of her work were very expressive to me. When I was looking around the exhibit,
I couldn’t help but think of the drawings I did when I was in elementary
school. I’d use the word “childhood” as a way to overall describe her artwork. To
me each piece seemed to tell a story that I didn’t understand but could tell
was there. I didn’t get that feeling from her more abstract work though.
Then
there’s Ida Applebroog’s work. I liked her exhibit the least of the two
but it still caught my interest. One part that really caught my interest was
her book series. They seemed oddly dark to me. I could tell from her work that
she dealt with depression. I also noticed a lot of self-questioning and
questioning of life in general from her work.
You used the word "childhood" but are King's drawings formally childish?
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't say that they're formally childish but more so that there are many references to characters that remind me of my childhood.
DeleteYlwahk, your blog is incomplete (no images of your work), and your posting of a response to this week's reading is late. Please keep up. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI've updated my blog. I will do my best to keep up from now on. Also I forgot to take pictures of my in-depth pieces when we were doing critiques on Thursday, so I will have to setup them up and photograph them. I will post them once I have done that.
Delete